<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 458 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, concluding that franchisee fees, advertisement expenses, sundry balances written off, late ESI contributions, and debenture restructuring fees were revenue expenditures. However, on matters concerning procedural lapses, including the donation to CRY, prior period expenses, and store relocation expenses, the Tribunal remanded the cases for reassessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:46:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 458 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, concluding that franchisee fees, advertisement expenses, sundry balances written off, late ESI contributions, and debenture restructuring fees were revenue expenditures. However, on matters concerning procedural lapses, including the donation to CRY, prior period expenses, and store relocation expenses, the Tribunal remanded the cases for reassessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>