https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165898 A right to redeem confiscated gold arose only when the Collector passed the redemption order, and because the amended gold control rules were already in force on that date, the order remained subject to the newly conferred revisional power. The claimant therefore had no vested right immune from revision merely because the redemption fine had been paid. The Gold Control Administrator's prior administrative grant of a permit to possess primary gold did not bar the exercise of separate statutory revisional jurisdiction, since the permit function and revision operated in different fields. The challenge to the revisional notice was rejected, and no legal error was found in the dismissal of the writ petition. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:26:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165898 A right to redeem confiscated gold arose only when the Collector passed the redemption order, and because the amended gold control rules were already in force on that date, the order remained subject to the newly conferred revisional power. The claimant therefore had no vested right immune from revision merely because the redemption fine had been paid. The Gold Control Administrator's prior administrative grant of a permit to possess primary gold did not bar the exercise of separate statutory revisional jurisdiction, since the permit function and revision operated in different fields. The challenge to the revisional notice was rejected, and no legal error was found in the dismissal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165898