<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 248 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165867</link>
    <description>Contravention of the Gold (Control) Act was established because the person concerned was not a certified goldsmith and the records did not tally with the seized gold, supporting confiscation and penalty. However, the surrounding material, including the nature of the gold and some support for the claim that old ornaments were being remade, justified leniency against absolute confiscation. The confiscation was therefore modified to permit redemption of the gold on payment of a fine, while the penalty was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 248 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165867</link>
      <description>Contravention of the Gold (Control) Act was established because the person concerned was not a certified goldsmith and the records did not tally with the seized gold, supporting confiscation and penalty. However, the surrounding material, including the nature of the gold and some support for the claim that old ornaments were being remade, justified leniency against absolute confiscation. The confiscation was therefore modified to permit redemption of the gold on payment of a fine, while the penalty was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>