<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250506</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the appellate Commissioner&#039;s order was upheld. The court emphasized that the tax rate applicable is the one in force at the time of service provision, not at the payment receipt date. The judgment reiterated the principle that only the prevailing rate at the service provision time can be levied and collected, as per established legal principles and a Delhi High Court case. The appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250506</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the appellate Commissioner&#039;s order was upheld. The court emphasized that the tax rate applicable is the one in force at the time of service provision, not at the payment receipt date. The judgment reiterated the principle that only the prevailing rate at the service provision time can be levied and collected, as per established legal principles and a Delhi High Court case. The appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>