https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250505 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming a service tax demand against a partnership firm for underreporting in their returns related to C&F services provided to M/s J.P. Cement. The appellant's exclusion of certain reimbursed expenses led to service tax underpayment, justifying the extended limitation period and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the tax authorities, affirming the liability on the gross remuneration received for C&F services and upholding the penalty imposed on the appellant. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:33:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250505 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming a service tax demand against a partnership firm for underreporting in their returns related to C&F services provided to M/s J.P. Cement. The appellant's exclusion of certain reimbursed expenses led to service tax underpayment, justifying the extended limitation period and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the tax authorities, affirming the liability on the gross remuneration received for C&F services and upholding the penalty imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250505