<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest and penalty imposed on a Public Limited Company for non-payment of service tax through TR-6 challans. The appellant&#039;s argument that the tax liability determination was delayed was rejected. The Tribunal affirmed the liability for interest and penalty under Sections 75 and 76 of the Finance Act, emphasizing the importance of timely tax payments and the establishment of systems to ensure compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest and penalty imposed on a Public Limited Company for non-payment of service tax through TR-6 challans. The appellant&#039;s argument that the tax liability determination was delayed was rejected. The Tribunal affirmed the liability for interest and penalty under Sections 75 and 76 of the Finance Act, emphasizing the importance of timely tax payments and the establishment of systems to ensure compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>