https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250485 The appellant's stay application and appeal against the Order-in-Original (OIA) dismissal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 1,40,000 was successful. Despite the initial dismissal, the judge acknowledged the appellant's strong case based on a favorable High Court judgment regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on CHA services and Clearing & Forwarding Agent Services. The judge deemed the pre-deposit requirement unjust given the valid argument presented and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority for a decision on merits without insisting on the pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250485 The appellant's stay application and appeal against the Order-in-Original (OIA) dismissal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 1,40,000 was successful. Despite the initial dismissal, the judge acknowledged the appellant's strong case based on a favorable High Court judgment regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on CHA services and Clearing & Forwarding Agent Services. The judge deemed the pre-deposit requirement unjust given the valid argument presented and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority for a decision on merits without insisting on the pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250485