<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 431 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250481</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected merely because identical goods imported contemporaneously in the same vessel were invoiced at a higher price. Where the import is supported by the contract price and there is no evidence of extra consideration, collusion, misdeclaration or undervaluation, contemporaneous price comparison alone does not justify enhancement of assessable value. Different contracts and fluctuating international prices weaken reliance on the higher import price as a benchmark. The declared value was therefore accepted and enhancement of assessable value was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 431 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250481</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected merely because identical goods imported contemporaneously in the same vessel were invoiced at a higher price. Where the import is supported by the contract price and there is no evidence of extra consideration, collusion, misdeclaration or undervaluation, contemporaneous price comparison alone does not justify enhancement of assessable value. Different contracts and fluctuating international prices weaken reliance on the higher import price as a benchmark. The declared value was therefore accepted and enhancement of assessable value was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>