<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 430 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250480</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not arise merely because the statutory notice was issued from a particular place. A unilateral dispatch of notice from Gurgaon was insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the Gurgaon court. As the cheque was issued and dishonoured at Bangalore, the jurisdictional ingredients were not established at Gurgaon. The complaint was therefore liable to be transferred to the competent court at Bangalore under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 430 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250480</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not arise merely because the statutory notice was issued from a particular place. A unilateral dispatch of notice from Gurgaon was insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the Gurgaon court. As the cheque was issued and dishonoured at Bangalore, the jurisdictional ingredients were not established at Gurgaon. The complaint was therefore liable to be transferred to the competent court at Bangalore under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>