https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250479 Issuance of a Section 138 demand notice from Delhi did not by itself confer territorial jurisdiction on the Delhi court, because the place from which the notice was sent was not the legally relevant jurisdictional fact for cognizance. Jurisdiction instead depended on the cheque being drawn on a bank at Vellore and dishonoured there, leaving Delhi without jurisdiction on the basis asserted by the complainant. The complaint was therefore liable to be transferred to Vellore, and the transfer was also supported by the medical condition of one petitioner. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250479 Issuance of a Section 138 demand notice from Delhi did not by itself confer territorial jurisdiction on the Delhi court, because the place from which the notice was sent was not the legally relevant jurisdictional fact for cognizance. Jurisdiction instead depended on the cheque being drawn on a bank at Vellore and dishonoured there, leaving Delhi without jurisdiction on the basis asserted by the complainant. The complaint was therefore liable to be transferred to Vellore, and the transfer was also supported by the medical condition of one petitioner. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250479