<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250474</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, holding that the redemption fine paid to Customs authorities was an allowable expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the respondent acted in good faith and had not incurred the expenditure for a prohibited purpose, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250474</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, holding that the redemption fine paid to Customs authorities was an allowable expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the respondent acted in good faith and had not incurred the expenditure for a prohibited purpose, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>