https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165850 Refund claims rejected on disputed factual grounds, including delay, alleged non-furnishing of indents, and absence of the master's signatures, were required to be reconsidered because the claimants said they had not been heard before rejection. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication by the original authority through a reasoned speaking order after granting a personal hearing, in observance of natural justice. The earlier rejection was not sustained. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:19:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165850 Refund claims rejected on disputed factual grounds, including delay, alleged non-furnishing of indents, and absence of the master's signatures, were required to be reconsidered because the claimants said they had not been heard before rejection. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication by the original authority through a reasoned speaking order after granting a personal hearing, in observance of natural justice. The earlier rejection was not sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165850