<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 290 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165829</link>
    <description>The Central Government of India allowed the revision application of a coffee dealer penalized for dealing in non-duty paid coffee. The Government found that the dealer was not liable under Rule 9(2) as it applies to producers or manufacturers only. The seized roasted coffee was not proven to be made from non-duty paid raw coffee. The impugned order was set aside, and the revision application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 290 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165829</link>
      <description>The Central Government of India allowed the revision application of a coffee dealer penalized for dealing in non-duty paid coffee. The Government found that the dealer was not liable under Rule 9(2) as it applies to producers or manufacturers only. The seized roasted coffee was not proven to be made from non-duty paid raw coffee. The impugned order was set aside, and the revision application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>