<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250466</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially modified its orders to allow Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited to deposit the maturity value/sale consideration of financial instruments with SEBI. The court permitted the sale of properties within India to meet bail requirements and allowed charging immovable property to furnish a bank guarantee. Permission to sell offshore properties was granted, subject to conditions on sale price and depositing proceeds with SEBI. Requests for temporary release on parole were dismissed. The court clarified that property sales should not be less than the estimated value with a maximum 5% reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250466</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially modified its orders to allow Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited to deposit the maturity value/sale consideration of financial instruments with SEBI. The court permitted the sale of properties within India to meet bail requirements and allowed charging immovable property to furnish a bank guarantee. Permission to sell offshore properties was granted, subject to conditions on sale price and depositing proceeds with SEBI. Requests for temporary release on parole were dismissed. The court clarified that property sales should not be less than the estimated value with a maximum 5% reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>