https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250464 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Service Tax liability for installation and commissioning services provided by foreign suppliers should not be imposed separately when the entire contract value, including services, was already subject to customs duty payment. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument on the applicability of specific notifications for service valuation, stating they were not applicable in this scenario. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition unconditionally in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250464 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Service Tax liability for installation and commissioning services provided by foreign suppliers should not be imposed separately when the entire contract value, including services, was already subject to customs duty payment. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument on the applicability of specific notifications for service valuation, stating they were not applicable in this scenario. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition unconditionally in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250464