<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty demand and penalties on PBPL and associated individuals for alleged evasion of Central Excise duty, supported by evidence from seized documents and electronic devices. PBPL was directed to deposit additional funds to stay recovery, with penalties waived for individuals pending appeal. The decision balanced procedural fairness and substantive evidence, safeguarding Revenue interests during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty demand and penalties on PBPL and associated individuals for alleged evasion of Central Excise duty, supported by evidence from seized documents and electronic devices. PBPL was directed to deposit additional funds to stay recovery, with penalties waived for individuals pending appeal. The decision balanced procedural fairness and substantive evidence, safeguarding Revenue interests during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>