<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250440</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2007-08, as it found no reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment. The Court noted the lack of new valid reasons for reopening and rejected claims of the assessee being engaged solely in share trading. The petition was allowed, and the order disposing of objections was set aside with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250440</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2007-08, as it found no reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment. The Court noted the lack of new valid reasons for reopening and rejected claims of the assessee being engaged solely in share trading. The petition was allowed, and the order disposing of objections was set aside with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>