<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 224 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165821</link>
    <description>Multi-stage pressure blowers were held to fall within the tariff description of industrial fans because excise classification depended on commercial and functional identity rather than fine technical differences. The authority compared fans, blowers and compressors, noting that the relevant distinction was the degree of compression and pressure produced. As the goods were in substance similar to centrifugal fans as understood in trade and reflected in the technical specification, they were correctly classified under Tariff Item No. 33(2). The cited High Court ruling was distinguished because it concerned lobe compressors, not goods of the present description.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 224 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165821</link>
      <description>Multi-stage pressure blowers were held to fall within the tariff description of industrial fans because excise classification depended on commercial and functional identity rather than fine technical differences. The authority compared fans, blowers and compressors, noting that the relevant distinction was the degree of compression and pressure produced. As the goods were in substance similar to centrifugal fans as understood in trade and reflected in the technical specification, they were correctly classified under Tariff Item No. 33(2). The cited High Court ruling was distinguished because it concerned lobe compressors, not goods of the present description.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>