<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 221 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165813</link>
    <description>Goods emerging after printing, waxing, winding and slitting of paper rolls were treated as waxed paper, not as mere products of the printing industry. The final product acquired a distinct name, character and use from the base paper, and Tariff Item 17(2) was read broadly to cover paper subjected to treatments including coating and design printing. On that basis, classification under Tariff Item 68 was rejected and the claimed exemption under Notification 55/75 was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:42:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 221 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165813</link>
      <description>Goods emerging after printing, waxing, winding and slitting of paper rolls were treated as waxed paper, not as mere products of the printing industry. The final product acquired a distinct name, character and use from the base paper, and Tariff Item 17(2) was read broadly to cover paper subjected to treatments including coating and design printing. On that basis, classification under Tariff Item 68 was rejected and the claimed exemption under Notification 55/75 was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>