<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal on the condition that the appellant remits the specified amount to the credit of Revenue and provides proof of such remittance within two weeks. Failure to comply would result in the appeal being rejected. The Tribunal set aside the earlier order and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed with the appeal on its merits after the specified conditions were met, waiving the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 382 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal on the condition that the appellant remits the specified amount to the credit of Revenue and provides proof of such remittance within two weeks. Failure to comply would result in the appeal being rejected. The Tribunal set aside the earlier order and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed with the appeal on its merits after the specified conditions were met, waiving the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>