<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250422</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 05.05.2014 in TIN.33710040344/2008-09, ruling it illegal as it was issued without considering a previous decision and without providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The court allowed the writ petition, granting the respondent the chance to issue a fresh notice and hear the petitioner before making any new decisions. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250422</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 05.05.2014 in TIN.33710040344/2008-09, ruling it illegal as it was issued without considering a previous decision and without providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The court allowed the writ petition, granting the respondent the chance to issue a fresh notice and hear the petitioner before making any new decisions. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>