https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250412 The judgment addressed excise duty demands, penalties under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, and interest calculations. It analyzed the impact of burning loss percentages on revenue, considering technical reports and suppression of quantity manufacture. The evaluation of SION norms in determining burning loss, concerns about revenue collection due to interim orders, and the need for a balance of convenience in granting relief were discussed. The judgment required appellants to deposit 15% of duty demanded for fair appeal participation. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250412 The judgment addressed excise duty demands, penalties under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, and interest calculations. It analyzed the impact of burning loss percentages on revenue, considering technical reports and suppression of quantity manufacture. The evaluation of SION norms in determining burning loss, concerns about revenue collection due to interim orders, and the need for a balance of convenience in granting relief were discussed. The judgment required appellants to deposit 15% of duty demanded for fair appeal participation. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250412