<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250397</link>
    <description>The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the stay petition pending appeal lacked proper application of mind and interfered with the impugned order. Acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s charitable activities and pending appeal, the Court granted a conditional stay order, requiring a deposit of Rs. 75,00,000 within eight weeks. The remaining demand would stay until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s right to present arguments before the appellate authority and directed prompt appeal disposal within three months, urging cooperation for a swift resolution. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:15:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=362059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250397</link>
      <description>The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the stay petition pending appeal lacked proper application of mind and interfered with the impugned order. Acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s charitable activities and pending appeal, the Court granted a conditional stay order, requiring a deposit of Rs. 75,00,000 within eight weeks. The remaining demand would stay until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s right to present arguments before the appellate authority and directed prompt appeal disposal within three months, urging cooperation for a swift resolution. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>