<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 342 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250392</link>
    <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit based on using a debit note, deemed improper. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, holding them entitled to the credit. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 342 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250392</link>
      <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit based on using a debit note, deemed improper. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, holding them entitled to the credit. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>