<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 338 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250388</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI admitted the appeal as the amount in dispute was less than Rs. 50,000. The issue related to service tax, and the proviso under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was found not applicable. The appeal was admitted based on this finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 338 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250388</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI admitted the appeal as the amount in dispute was less than Rs. 50,000. The issue related to service tax, and the proviso under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was found not applicable. The appeal was admitted based on this finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>