<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 334 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250384</link>
    <description>Detained goods were directed to be released pending adjudication on payment of the amount contemplated under the Act, following an identical earlier matter where release had been granted on payment under protest. The Court did not examine the detention on merits, and it preserved the respondent&#039;s right to continue with adjudication. The petitioner was required to participate in the adjudication proceedings after obtaining release of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 334 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250384</link>
      <description>Detained goods were directed to be released pending adjudication on payment of the amount contemplated under the Act, following an identical earlier matter where release had been granted on payment under protest. The Court did not examine the detention on merits, and it preserved the respondent&#039;s right to continue with adjudication. The petitioner was required to participate in the adjudication proceedings after obtaining release of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>