<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 187 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165766</link>
    <description>Salt Flushing Oil was held outside Tariff Item 11B because its dominant character was solvent flushing, used to remove deposits from crank cases and gear boxes after draining used lubricant. Its lubricating quality was treated as secondary, so it did not answer the description of blended lubricating oil and greases. The classification under the disputed tariff entry was therefore rejected, the impugned appellate classification was set aside, and the revision application was allowed. The governing principle stated is that tariff classification depends on the primary and dominant use of the product where that use does not match the essential character of the claimed entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 187 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165766</link>
      <description>Salt Flushing Oil was held outside Tariff Item 11B because its dominant character was solvent flushing, used to remove deposits from crank cases and gear boxes after draining used lubricant. Its lubricating quality was treated as secondary, so it did not answer the description of blended lubricating oil and greases. The classification under the disputed tariff entry was therefore rejected, the impugned appellate classification was set aside, and the revision application was allowed. The governing principle stated is that tariff classification depends on the primary and dominant use of the product where that use does not match the essential character of the claimed entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>