<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 152 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165762</link>
    <description>The product &quot;bead repair fabric&quot; made by rubberising grey canvas was classified as rubberised fabric under Tariff Item 19I(i) instead of a rubber product under Tariff Item 16A(2). The demand for processing surcharge was upheld, and the Government&#039;s revision application was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:50:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 152 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165762</link>
      <description>The product &quot;bead repair fabric&quot; made by rubberising grey canvas was classified as rubberised fabric under Tariff Item 19I(i) instead of a rubber product under Tariff Item 16A(2). The demand for processing surcharge was upheld, and the Government&#039;s revision application was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>