https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250376 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by a sugar mill regarding the clearance of Bagasse without duty payment. Citing a judgment by the Allahabad High Court, the Tribunal determined that Bagasse, as a byproduct, does not attract payment under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This decision clarifies Bagasse's classification as a waste product rather than an excisable good, emphasizing the significance of legal precedents in resolving excise duty disputes for manufacturers dealing with exempted products like Bagasse. en-us Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250376 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by a sugar mill regarding the clearance of Bagasse without duty payment. Citing a judgment by the Allahabad High Court, the Tribunal determined that Bagasse, as a byproduct, does not attract payment under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This decision clarifies Bagasse's classification as a waste product rather than an excisable good, emphasizing the significance of legal precedents in resolving excise duty disputes for manufacturers dealing with exempted products like Bagasse. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250376