https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250369 The Tribunal held that insisting on pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeals was unnecessary on the facts, and the appeals should be decided on merits without such deposit. The orders requiring deposit of 50% of the duty demanded were set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision without insisting on any pre-deposit and after giving the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The connected miscellaneous application was treated as infructuous once the appeal was taken up for final hearing. en-us Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250369 The Tribunal held that insisting on pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeals was unnecessary on the facts, and the appeals should be decided on merits without such deposit. The orders requiring deposit of 50% of the duty demanded were set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision without insisting on any pre-deposit and after giving the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The connected miscellaneous application was treated as infructuous once the appeal was taken up for final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250369