<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165749</link>
    <description>Standing order modifications under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act are assessed for fairness and reasonableness, and the power to seek modification is not textually confined to cases of changed circumstances; certification finality does not bar later modification. Provisions requiring reasons on discharge, disposal of appeals within 60 days, and alternative employment for physical unfitness were treated as fair, while a second show-cause notice before removal was held unsupported and unduly dilatory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165749</link>
      <description>Standing order modifications under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act are assessed for fairness and reasonableness, and the power to seek modification is not textually confined to cases of changed circumstances; certification finality does not bar later modification. Provisions requiring reasons on discharge, disposal of appeals within 60 days, and alternative employment for physical unfitness were treated as fair, while a second show-cause notice before removal was held unsupported and unduly dilatory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>