<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 317 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-classification of imported goods under Chapter 38, following a Supreme Court decision on technical grade pesticides, leading to the directive for predeposit of duty amounts by the applicants. Non-compliance with the stay order resulted in the dismissal of appeals, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and orders. Compliance with the directives and timelines set forth for predeposit was highlighted as crucial, with the provision for waiver of the balance dues upon compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2014 07:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 317 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-classification of imported goods under Chapter 38, following a Supreme Court decision on technical grade pesticides, leading to the directive for predeposit of duty amounts by the applicants. Non-compliance with the stay order resulted in the dismissal of appeals, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and orders. Compliance with the directives and timelines set forth for predeposit was highlighted as crucial, with the provision for waiver of the balance dues upon compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>