<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250349</link>
    <description>Where a special appellate statute prescribes a filing period and a fixed maximum condonable delay, that statutory ceiling cannot be extended by relying on the Limitation Act, 1963. An appeal filed beyond the outer limit of condonation was therefore not maintainable and was rejected as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250349</link>
      <description>Where a special appellate statute prescribes a filing period and a fixed maximum condonable delay, that statutory ceiling cannot be extended by relying on the Limitation Act, 1963. An appeal filed beyond the outer limit of condonation was therefore not maintainable and was rejected as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>