<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 255 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165745</link>
    <description>The Board set aside the Collector&#039;s orders confiscating 33 video cassette recorders under the Customs Act, valued at Rs. 1,59,347, for alleged undervaluation and lack of a valid license. The defense successfully argued that the importations were compliant with import license terms and Customs formalities, emphasizing the distinction between components for video cassette recorders and monitors. The Board found no evidence of undervaluation and concluded that the Collector&#039;s orders were unfounded. As a result, the Board allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the fine and penalty paid by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 255 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165745</link>
      <description>The Board set aside the Collector&#039;s orders confiscating 33 video cassette recorders under the Customs Act, valued at Rs. 1,59,347, for alleged undervaluation and lack of a valid license. The defense successfully argued that the importations were compliant with import license terms and Customs formalities, emphasizing the distinction between components for video cassette recorders and monitors. The Board found no evidence of undervaluation and concluded that the Collector&#039;s orders were unfounded. As a result, the Board allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the fine and penalty paid by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>