<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 292 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that payment of duty from the Cenvat credit account during the default period did not result in revenue loss except for interest. The appellant was required to pay interest and a penalty under Rule 27. The Tribunal interpreted Rule 8(3A) to mandate payment through PLA during default periods. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the duty amount along with a penalty within 8 weeks for the appeal hearing. Compliance reporting was scheduled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 292 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that payment of duty from the Cenvat credit account during the default period did not result in revenue loss except for interest. The appellant was required to pay interest and a penalty under Rule 27. The Tribunal interpreted Rule 8(3A) to mandate payment through PLA during default periods. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the duty amount along with a penalty within 8 weeks for the appeal hearing. Compliance reporting was scheduled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>