https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250341 The court quashed the Settlement Commission's order rejecting the petitioner's application and remanded the matter back to the Settlement Commission. The Commission was directed to pass an appropriate order under Section 32F(5) of the Central Excise Act regarding the demand of Rs. 35,13,847 under Section 11D, after following due procedure and providing an opportunity for a hearing. The Settlement Commission was instructed to complete this exercise within six months from the date of receipt of the court's order. The rule was made absolute to this extent, with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250341 The court quashed the Settlement Commission's order rejecting the petitioner's application and remanded the matter back to the Settlement Commission. The Commission was directed to pass an appropriate order under Section 32F(5) of the Central Excise Act regarding the demand of Rs. 35,13,847 under Section 11D, after following due procedure and providing an opportunity for a hearing. The Settlement Commission was instructed to complete this exercise within six months from the date of receipt of the court's order. The rule was made absolute to this extent, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250341