<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 280 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165726</link>
    <description>The court determined that the special duty of excise imposed by the Finance Act, 1965, is a distinct duty separate from regular excise duty. Additionally, the term &quot;duty of excise payable&quot; in Section 280ZD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, refers to the duty lawfully paid, not merely the duty leviable. The court dismissed the appeals and writ petition, upholding the single judge&#039;s decision. Each party was responsible for their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 280 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165726</link>
      <description>The court determined that the special duty of excise imposed by the Finance Act, 1965, is a distinct duty separate from regular excise duty. Additionally, the term &quot;duty of excise payable&quot; in Section 280ZD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, refers to the duty lawfully paid, not merely the duty leviable. The court dismissed the appeals and writ petition, upholding the single judge&#039;s decision. Each party was responsible for their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>