<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 299 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165725</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the Appellate Collector held that packing costs and forwarding charges should not be included in the assessable value of excisable goods, as they fall outside the scope defined in the Central Excises and Salt Act. Transport costs were also excluded from the value of excisable goods for assessment purposes due to no sale at the factory gate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 299 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165725</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the Appellate Collector held that packing costs and forwarding charges should not be included in the assessable value of excisable goods, as they fall outside the scope defined in the Central Excises and Salt Act. Transport costs were also excluded from the value of excisable goods for assessment purposes due to no sale at the factory gate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>