<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blank Endorsement</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107148</link>
    <description>Query concerning interpretation of an LC clause requiring bills of lading &quot;made out to order and endorsed in blank,&quot; asking whether the consignee field must be left blank and the bill endorsed on the reverse, and noting a forum reply requesting confirmation whether the issue was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:23:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Blank Endorsement</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107148</link>
      <description>Query concerning interpretation of an LC clause requiring bills of lading &quot;made out to order and endorsed in blank,&quot; asking whether the consignee field must be left blank and the bill endorsed on the reverse, and noting a forum reply requesting confirmation whether the issue was resolved.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:23:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>