<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 269 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal due to the Applicant&#039;s non-compliance with the deposit directive and absence of a stay order against the Tribunal&#039;s directive under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasizes the necessity of adhering to Tribunal directives and obtaining stay orders from higher forums when contesting such directives to avoid dismissal of appeals for non-compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 269 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal due to the Applicant&#039;s non-compliance with the deposit directive and absence of a stay order against the Tribunal&#039;s directive under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasizes the necessity of adhering to Tribunal directives and obtaining stay orders from higher forums when contesting such directives to avoid dismissal of appeals for non-compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>