<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 268 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250318</link>
    <description>Commission agent activity connected with procurement of sugarcane from cane-growing farmers was treated as falling within the exemption for commission agents dealing in agricultural produce, rather than taxable Business Auxiliary Service. The demand alleged procurement inputs for a sugar factory, but the show cause notice itself described the appellant as acting for farmers in relation to harvesting and transportation of sugarcane. On the material available at the stay stage, the activity was found to be covered by the notification exemption under the Finance Act, and a strong prima facie case was established. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 268 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250318</link>
      <description>Commission agent activity connected with procurement of sugarcane from cane-growing farmers was treated as falling within the exemption for commission agents dealing in agricultural produce, rather than taxable Business Auxiliary Service. The demand alleged procurement inputs for a sugar factory, but the show cause notice itself described the appellant as acting for farmers in relation to harvesting and transportation of sugarcane. On the material available at the stay stage, the activity was found to be covered by the notification exemption under the Finance Act, and a strong prima facie case was established. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>