<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 251 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the cement manufacturers, allowing their claim for concessional duty rates under specific notifications for sales to builders, developers, and industrial consumers. The Tribunal held that the buyers qualified as &#039;industrial consumers&#039; or &#039;institutional consumers,&#039; exempting them from affixing MRP on packages. It clarified the applicability of Legal Metrology Rules to exclude such sales from MRP requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s decision invalidated duty demands by the Commissioner of Central Excise, providing relief to the appellants and upholding their eligibility for concessional rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 251 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the cement manufacturers, allowing their claim for concessional duty rates under specific notifications for sales to builders, developers, and industrial consumers. The Tribunal held that the buyers qualified as &#039;industrial consumers&#039; or &#039;institutional consumers,&#039; exempting them from affixing MRP on packages. It clarified the applicability of Legal Metrology Rules to exclude such sales from MRP requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s decision invalidated duty demands by the Commissioner of Central Excise, providing relief to the appellants and upholding their eligibility for concessional rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>