<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 249 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the Applicant&#039;s compliance with reversing a proportionate credit on inputs and input services attributable to exempted final products. Despite discrepancies in the Department&#039;s quantification, the Applicant had already reversed a significant amount. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Stay Petition, waiving the pre-deposit of the balance dues and staying its recovery during the pendency of the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 249 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the Applicant&#039;s compliance with reversing a proportionate credit on inputs and input services attributable to exempted final products. Despite discrepancies in the Department&#039;s quantification, the Applicant had already reversed a significant amount. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Stay Petition, waiving the pre-deposit of the balance dues and staying its recovery during the pendency of the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>