<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 244 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250294</link>
    <description>An imported atlas containing an allegedly objectionable map was not treated as liable to absolute confiscation where the disputed page carried a disclaimer and indicated the line of control without claiming official endorsement. Following its earlier approach, the Tribunal held that objectionable maps or pages could be removed and destroyed in the presence of Customs authorities, after which the remaining book could be released if unobjectionable. The offer to excise the material was accepted as reasonable, and absolute confiscation was not sustained. In view of the prolonged clearance delay, redemption fine was declined, but the penalty was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 244 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250294</link>
      <description>An imported atlas containing an allegedly objectionable map was not treated as liable to absolute confiscation where the disputed page carried a disclaimer and indicated the line of control without claiming official endorsement. Following its earlier approach, the Tribunal held that objectionable maps or pages could be removed and destroyed in the presence of Customs authorities, after which the remaining book could be released if unobjectionable. The offer to excise the material was accepted as reasonable, and absolute confiscation was not sustained. In view of the prolonged clearance delay, redemption fine was declined, but the penalty was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>