<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 177 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165709</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the assessment of excise duty on goods exceeding the exemption limit. The Central Excise Officers found the appellant had cleared goods above the limit, necessitating duty payment. The Collector seized goods for further action. The inclusion of &quot;installation charges&quot; in the assessable value was disputed, with the Board directing exclusion unless separately realized. A personal penalty was contested and set aside due to lack of mens rea. Treatment of glass panels in assessable value was clarified to avoid double taxation. Confiscation of goods for license failure was upheld, with the fine deemed reasonable. Personal penalty imposition was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 177 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165709</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the assessment of excise duty on goods exceeding the exemption limit. The Central Excise Officers found the appellant had cleared goods above the limit, necessitating duty payment. The Collector seized goods for further action. The inclusion of &quot;installation charges&quot; in the assessable value was disputed, with the Board directing exclusion unless separately realized. A personal penalty was contested and set aside due to lack of mens rea. Treatment of glass panels in assessable value was clarified to avoid double taxation. Confiscation of goods for license failure was upheld, with the fine deemed reasonable. Personal penalty imposition was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>