<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 813 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165706</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the matter, and directed that it be tagged with connected civil appeals. It also declined to grant stay. The order reflects only procedural directions and does not decide the substantive central excise issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 813 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165706</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the matter, and directed that it be tagged with connected civil appeals. It also declined to grant stay. The order reflects only procedural directions and does not decide the substantive central excise issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>