https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165704 The Court found that the Collector erred in disregarding the revisional authority's directive to consider the petitioners' experience in the gold trade, which had already been established. The Collector's decision to reject the gold dealer's license application based solely on lack of experience was deemed unsustainable. The Court directed the Collector to review the application, emphasizing that the petitioners met the experience requirement and instructing the Collector to focus on other conditions outlined in the rules. The Collector's decision was set aside, and the respondents were ordered to bear the petitioners' costs due to the unjustifiable rejection. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:38:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165704 The Court found that the Collector erred in disregarding the revisional authority's directive to consider the petitioners' experience in the gold trade, which had already been established. The Collector's decision to reject the gold dealer's license application based solely on lack of experience was deemed unsustainable. The Court directed the Collector to review the application, emphasizing that the petitioners met the experience requirement and instructing the Collector to focus on other conditions outlined in the rules. The Collector's decision was set aside, and the respondents were ordered to bear the petitioners' costs due to the unjustifiable rejection. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165704