<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 277 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165703</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a company running Tata Consultancy Services, in a case involving the classification of an imported computer system. The court determined that the computer system should be classified as a machine under Tariff Item No. 72(b) instead of an electrical apparatus under Tariff Item No. 73. The customs authorities were directed to refund the excess duty paid by the petitioners and awarded them the costs of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 277 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165703</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a company running Tata Consultancy Services, in a case involving the classification of an imported computer system. The court determined that the computer system should be classified as a machine under Tariff Item No. 72(b) instead of an electrical apparatus under Tariff Item No. 73. The customs authorities were directed to refund the excess duty paid by the petitioners and awarded them the costs of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>