https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165698 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that pledged and personal ornaments should not be clubbed together for declaration purposes under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. As both sets of ornaments were within the prescribed limits in their respective capacities, no declaration was required. The court quashed the orders imposing fines and confiscating the household ornaments, directing the return of the confiscated ornaments to the petitioner. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:18:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165698 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that pledged and personal ornaments should not be clubbed together for declaration purposes under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. As both sets of ornaments were within the prescribed limits in their respective capacities, no declaration was required. The court quashed the orders imposing fines and confiscating the household ornaments, directing the return of the confiscated ornaments to the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165698