<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165693</link>
    <description>The court decided in favor of the plaintiff on the issues of territorial jurisdiction and limitation period. However, the court held that the suit was not maintainable under the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, the court dismissed the suit with costs, emphasizing that the levy of customs duty had attained finality and could not be revisited solely due to a subsequent Supreme Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165693</link>
      <description>The court decided in favor of the plaintiff on the issues of territorial jurisdiction and limitation period. However, the court held that the suit was not maintainable under the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, the court dismissed the suit with costs, emphasizing that the levy of customs duty had attained finality and could not be revisited solely due to a subsequent Supreme Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>